Copyright © 2000 by Creation Research Society. All
Don B. DeYoung
CRSQ Volume 36 No. 4 March 2000
Dark matter has never been directly observed. Its presence is indicated
by unexplained gravitational effects on stars and galaxies. It is sought
within galaxies, in galaxy clusters and throughout space. Surprisingly,
dark matter appears to comprise the bulk of the entire universe. This
article surveys the evidence along with possible micro and macroscopic
dark matter candidates. The entire idea is then evaluated from the creation
perspective. There are also theological implications.
Astronomy is sometimes presented as successfully having answered the
most basic questions about the universe. One popular book attempts to
explain the complete evolution of the universe to within 10-43
seconds of its origin (Hawking, 1996). This number is called the Planck
time, when some cosmologists think the present laws of physics originated.
In truth, of course, many fundamental questions remain. We actually
know very little about our neigh- boring planets, and much less about
the deep space beyond. Consider just a few of the mysteries in modern
- Origin of the moon
- Star and galaxy formation .Source of cosmic rays
- Nature of quasars and their distances .Absence of evolved life elsewhere
- Dark matter
The last entry is explored in this article. Dark matter is so called
because it emits no detectable radiation. In our current understanding
of astronomy and physics, dark matter must comprise the majority of
mass in the universe, between 90-99 percent. Yet it has never been detected
with certainty, if it indeed exists. Carl Sagan described it as dark,
quintessential, deeply mysterious stuff wholly unknown on earth (Sagan,
1994, p. 399). Astronomers therefore have no idea of the composition
of the bulk of the entire universe. So much for a fundamental understanding
of the physical universe! Dark matter is an apt topic for review and
for a creationist evaluation. There is a large number of dark matter
discussions and references currently available on the internet.
What Dark Matter is Not
The term dark matter does not refer to dark nebulae. These are abundant
interstellar clouds of dust, which block the light from background stars,
and therefore appear as dark silhouettes. Nearby examples include Orion's
Horsehead nebula, the Great Rift in Cygnus and the Coal Sack near the
Some students of the Bible have described a particular dark region
in the northern sky. This is further proposed as the literal direction
toward heaven. The idea is based on Job 26:7 which describes the north
stretched out "over the empty place." However, there is no
such northern region of space which is devoid of stars or galaxies.
The Job reference simply describes the vastness of space in which stars
exist, including the northern sky (DeYoung, 1986).
Neither does dark matter refer to dark line spectra. Stellar light
spectra typically show dark lines where certain wavelengths have been
absorbed by the star's own atmospheric gases. Also, dark matter does
not refer to black holes. Finally, dark matter does not involve Olber's
paradox, the profound question of why the sky is dark at night, in spite
of seemingly endless stars.
The Location of Dark Matter
There are several alternate names for dark matter including missing
mass, hidden matter, shadow matter and hot or cold dark matter. Why
is it thought to exist and where must it be located? Dark matter will
be discussed in three hierarchical categories. It is sought first within
single galaxies. Next, the invisible material is thought to "glue"
galaxy groups or clusters together. Finally, popular versions of the
big bang model require immense amounts of dark matter existing throughout
space. These three reservoirs for dark matter will be considered in
the following sections.
In our solar system, inner planets travel faster than the outer planets.
Mercury has an orbital velocity of about 107 ,000 miles/hour (172,000
km/h), while Pluto's velocity averages nearly ten times less, only 10,000
miles/hour (16,000 km/h). This variation in speed follows directly from
Kepler's third law of planetary motion,
Here T, r, and v are the planet's orbital period, average radial distance
from the sun and velocity. G is the universal gravity constant and M
is the solar mass.
The stars within galaxies also experience orbital motion. In this case,
however, the main gravitational mass is not concentrated at the center
as in the solar system. Instead, stellar masses are spread throughout
the galaxy, with vast orbits about the center. Isaac Newton proved that
for such orbits, only mass lying within a star's orbit affects the star's
motion. The gravity force from external mass cancels completely. This
is exactly true only for a uniform spherical or circular distribution
of mass. However a galaxy provides a fair approximation, including the
disk-shaped spiral galaxies.
Equations 1 and 2 can be applied to an entire galaxy of revolving stars.
Each star responds to the total gravitation of the partial mass of the
galaxy that lies within its orbit. And it is exactly as if this mass
were all positioned at the center of the galaxy. The orbital velocity
of a star can be measured from the Doppler shift of its light. If the
star is near the outer edge of a galaxy, taking r as the galaxy radius
and knowing v, equation 2 then gives the total mass M of the galaxy.
And here a major problem arises. In every case, the calculated galaxy
mass is at least 5-10 times the mass of all the visible stars and other
matter in the galaxy .This missing mass component is considered to be
invisible dark matter.
There is a second way to look at the mass problem with spiral galaxies.
One can plot a rotation curve, a graph of velocity versus distance from
the galaxy center for component stars. Equation 2 shows that, for the
solar system, planet velocity decreases as the inverse square root of
distance from the sun. Because of the mass distribution of a spiral
galaxy, equation 2 is not followed precisely. However, star velocities
should still decrease as their outward distance increases. Instead,
however, measurements show flat rotation curves for galaxies (Figure
1). That is, the orbital velocities of remote galaxy stars are largely
constant, or even increase slightly with distance. The unexpected nature
of the rotation curve was first noted by astronomers Vera Rubin and
Kent Floyd in 1970, for the Andromeda galaxy. Said in another way, the
outer galaxy stars revolve unexpectedly fast. If galaxies are stable,
this implies a large amount of dark matter affecting stellar motion.
Otherwise, spiral galaxies should be flying apart. One possible mass
distribution is a giant halo of invisible matter surrounding and permeating
entire galaxies. X-ray telescopes, including Rosat, have shown possible
evidence for this halo around the Milky Way. However the question remains,
how can 90 percent of galaxy mass remain invisible to optical telescopes?
|Figure 1. A schematic rotation curve for
a typical spiral galaxy. The dashed line shows the trend of
star velocities expected from equation 2, if most of the mass
of a galaxy were within 40 million light years of the center.
The solid line shows actual measurements (Hawley and Holcomb.,
1998, p. 390).
The terms missing mass and dark matter were first suggested in 1933
by Cal Tech astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky. He observed the Coma cluster,
a group of at least 1,000 galaxies located 400 million light years distant.
These galaxies are assumed to be gravitationally bound together. Zwicky
noticed that the galaxies had random velocities, and moved much faster
than expected. In fact the galaxy cluster should have disintegrated
by now. This anomalous motion is likewise true of our own local group
of galaxies. This local group consists of the Milky Way, Andromeda,
Magellanic Clouds and about 30 other galaxies, all lying within about
a three million light year region.
Why have not these galaxies within clusters escaped from each other?
As before, an invisible binding mass of galaxy groups is considered
as dark matter. The galaxy motions suggest that the dark matter mass
totals at least ten times that of all the visible galaxies. This shortfall
in mass is much greater for the galaxy clusters than that within individual
galaxies. The Coma cluster is found to be 90 percent missing. Another
example, the Virgo cluster is 98 percent missing. That is, there is
assumed to be 50 times more mass than is actually observed. Figure 2
is a photograph negative of the center of the galaxy cluster Abell 1060.
The smaller pinpoints of light are nearby Milky Way galaxy stars. The
spirals and elliptical galaxies shown in the figure are a few of Abell
1060's two hundred galaxy members. The cluster is about 220 million
light years away.
|Figure 2. The central part of the galaxy cluster
Abell 1060. The photo is from the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh,
England (Bruck, 1990, p. 96).
Visible gas clouds within galaxy clusters also have added to the dark
matter requirement. X-ray observations reveal vast clouds of hot, low-density
gas within the clusters, Elsewhere, similar clouds appear to suffuse
regions of space far from galaxy clusters. These energetic gas molecules
are moving so fast that the observed clouds would quickly leak away
and dissipate on an evolutionary time scale. It is therefore concluded
that the clouds must contain much more matter than we see, binding them
In several cases, gravitational lenses appear to give multiple images
of the same quasar. Quasars are thought to be far distant, very bright
sources of light. Apparently, separate light signals from a distant
quasar can be bent by an intervening galaxy and then directed toward
the earth. In some cases the light-deflecting galaxies also can be seen.
On a more local scale, similar gravity lensing sometimes appears to
occur for stars within or near the Milky Way galaxy. However in these
cases there is no observed intervening object. Dark matter is suggested
as the cause of this light deflection. Several gravity lens surveys
are currently underway. It is hoped that positive results may help determine
the size of dark matter objects (Holz, 1999).
The virial theorem can be used to calculate the mass of a single galaxy
or a galaxy cluster. It applies if a system is gravitationally stable,
without collapse or disintegration taking place. The theorem states
that the total gravitational potential energy of the star system equals
exactly twice the total kinetic energy. If this condition is not met,
the component objects either will cascade inward or escape, depending
on the direction of imbalance.
From the virial theorem comes the mass formula for a galaxy cluster
(Bruck, 1990, p. 99),
Here V is the average of the squared radial velocities observed for
member galaxies within the cluster. R is an estimate of the geometric
radius of the entire cluster and G is the gravity constant.
As an example, consider Abell 1060, a cluster of about 200 galaxies
located 220 million light years away (Figure 2). Its V is about 7.14
x 105 m/s (0.24% light speed) and R is 6.1 x 1022 m ( 6.5
million light years ). The virial mass result is 14 x 1044
kg, or about 7 x 1014 solar masses. If there are 200 galaxies,
each then averages 3.5 x 1012 solar masses. This is about
10 times higher than the known mass of Andromeda and the Milky Way galaxies.
The Abell 1060 galaxies probably do not contain this much extra mass.
Instead the mass may exist as dark matter spread between the galaxies.
A similar numerical discrepancy exists for every galaxy cluster, assuming
they obey the virial condition.
Some astrophysicists have proposed that galaxy clusters are not gravitationally
bound after all, so the virial theorem does not apply. The use of the
theorem to calculate unseen mass has been called "totally unreasonable"
(Burbidge, et al., 1999, p. 42). However if the galaxies are disrupting,
then the clusters must be far younger than the multi-billion year age
usually assigned to them (Bowers and Deemings, 1984, p. 504).
Dark matter is also required on the largest scale of all, that of the
entire universe. In this case it is tied to versions of the big bang
theory in at least two ways. First, dark matter is enlisted to explain
the large-scale structure of the universe. In this view, the initial
universe expansion from a singularity must have experienced positional
variations in temperature or energy density. This resulted in a "clumpiness"
of matter, with subsequent formation of gas clouds, stars and galaxies.
The initial clumps grew larger in this way because of the gravity attraction
of invisible cold dark matter concentrations.
Dark matter is also involved in the popular inflationary big bang model
which predicts that the curvature of the universe must be flat (Figure
3). This means that the density of matter is exactly balanced between
a universe which eventually collapses (a closed, finite universe), and
one which expands forever (an open, infinite universe). The required
critical density for a flat universe is about 10-26 g/cm3.
This corresponds to approximately 10 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter
of space. Observed density estimates, although crude, lead to a value
10-100 times smaller than the critical density. Therefore a great amount
of dark matter is needed to result in a flat, closed universe with zero
|Figure 3. Three views of the
expansion of the universe over evolutionary time. The universe
is either a: closed, eventually collapsing on itself, b: flat,
ceasing expansion after infinite time; or c: open, expanding
What is Dark Matter?
This is an unanswered question since dark matter has never been directly
observed, and may not even exist. Nevertheless, many possible candidates
have been suggested (Trimble, 1987). Several will be listed and briefly
Non-luminous stars include primordial black holes; black, brown or
red dwarfs; and energy-depleted white dwarfs. An immense number of these
unlit stars would be needed to supply the necessary dark matter. If
they average 0.1 solar mass and comprise 90 percent of the total known
universe mass, then there must be at least 1025 such stars.
The basic problem is that none have been detected and identified with
certainty. Surely, such an astonishing number of non-luminous stars
easily should be detected with modern instruments. Even black holes
themselves remain as theoretical constructs which have not been verified
The brown dwarfs are a special case of failed, low mass stars which
never ignited their internal nuclear fusion reactions. They are sometimes
pictured as large gaseous planets, somewhat like Jupiter. They have
also been called MACHOS, or massive compact halo objects. Efforts have
been made to detect brown dwarfs indirectly by their eclipsing of normal
stars. That is, one watches for a distant star to temporarily disappear
when covered. The background starlight might also be distorted in a
microlensing effect. No clear brown dwarf evidence has been found
in this way, in spite of detailed searches (Hawley and Holcomb, 1998,
p. 391). There maybe many brown dwarf stars, or they may be vary rare.
Diffuse matter would consist of unseen dust or gas particles
that are widely dispersed. It has been described as molecular clouds,
intergalactic matter, and as halo or coronal material which surrounds
and permeates galaxies. The Milky Way contains l011 solar
masses. The required invisible dark matter is 100 times greater, 1013
solar masses worth. This would be an incredible amount of unseen diffuse
Neutrinos are an abundant product of nuclear fusion, the process
thought to energize stars including our sun. Creationists have suggested
that gravity contraction may also be occurring within stars (Steidl,
1983). Whatever the combination, some nuclear fusion does occur with
resulting neutrino production. From the sun, this sends a continuous
flood of neutrinos toward earth with a flux as great as 1012
Solar neutrinos have been detected, although only at about one-third
of their expected number. Neutrinos require large, highly specialized
detectors since the particles are very elusive and unreactive. Most
travel directly through the earth's 8,000 mile diameter without any
atomic collisions occurring.
Thus far, laboratory studies of neutrinos show zero mass. However,
there is a suggestion that neutrinos might oscillate between different
forms as they travel along at light speed. This behavior could mask
a vanishingly small but finite mass. With their large abundance throughout
space, neutrinos could thus comprise much of the sought-after dark matter.
The proposed dynamical behavior for neutrinos might also explain their
low abundance as measured from the sun. The problem remains, however,
that no one has observed any mass whatsoever for neutrinos. The idea
of neutrino mass appears to be a desperate hope for solving the embarrassing
Exotic particles are wisps of localized energy in space that have been
theorized but never observed. In physics jargon, exotic particles are
nonbarionic. They have much less mass than normal baryons such
as neutrons and protons. Exotic particles are often given fanciful acronyms.
WIMPS, or weakly interacting massive particles, are predicted by certain
theoretical physics models. No one knows whether such dark matter particles
exist. Nevertheless, they have been enlisted to help solve the solar
neutrino problem. It is proposed that WIMPS inside the sun might help
spread heat throughout the solar core. Solar energy could then be generated
at a slightly lower temperature, with fewer neutrinos produced than
A WIMP detector has been built in England, deep underground. It consists
of 200,000 liters of pure water. Scientists hope that an occasional
WIMP particle speeding in from space might interact with a hydrogen
atom in a detectable way. Results thus far have not been encouraging
Axions, whimsically named for a laundry detergent, are another type
of hypothesized subatomic particle which contribute mass to space. Other
proposed but unobserved particles include photinos, neutralinos, gravitons,
mini-black holes and antimatter. Astronomers also speak of bowling
balls, a shorthand title for ordinary space matter in some hard-to-detect
Other exotic particle candidates include cosmic strings or membranes,
preons and monopoles. There is certainly no shortage of suggestions
to identify dark matter. In reality, however, the dark matter mystery
remains completely unsolved after seven decades of intense study.
A Creationist Response
We have seen that dark matter is required if the laws of motion and
gravity hold for galaxies, and if galaxy systems are stable. Since creationists
are not locked into the big bang theory or evolutionary time, there
are several options to consider. They will be discussed here as questions.
Are the laws of nature universal? This question allows for entirely
different, unknown laws operating elsewhere in space. Dark matter then
might be only an illusion, based on our local understanding of physics.
However, there is no reason to expect such an unknowable multiverse
instead of a universe. Instead, light signals coming from deep space,
in all the intricate details of their spectra, appear much like light
sources within our laboratories. Therefore the dark matter problem cannot
easily be solved by rejecting known physics. Newton's and Kepler's laws
of motion and gravity appear to be universal in their extent and application.
Are galaxies stable? If dark matter is lacking in galaxies, then over
time they will simply disintegrate. This would be a major problem for
evolutionary time, since galaxies then should no longer exist. In the
recent creation view, however, little galaxy change would be noticeable
since the creation event. After all, galaxies average 100,000 light
years in diameter. In just 10,000 years, galaxy enlargement would be
Still, there is little reason to expect that galaxies are unstable
in this way. With few exceptions, mainly within the solar system, transients
and instabilities are not found in space studies. Instead, the created
universe is marked by great durability .Consider our sun, which has
sufficient hydrogen fuel to last for billions of years into the future,
although the Creator, of course, may have other plans. Galaxies can
be assumed to be stable, and thus must contain some form of dark matter.
Are galaxy clusters stable? Clusters are an entirely separate category
from individual galaxies. There is little reason from a creation perspective
why these clusters need to be bound together by unseen matter. The Creator
may simply have placed these clusters throughout space much as we see
them, with random galaxy velocities. Even if unbound, these clusters
would only dissipate on a billion year time scale because of their vast
size. Galaxy clusters may well be unstable in the long term.
Must the universe be flat? The creation view has no such requirement.
The flatness requirement arises only with the big bang theory. The Creator,
with equal ease, could have made a closed, flat or open universe. However,
I suggest that it may well be open, with a lack of large scale dark
matter. The simple reason may be to frustrate all natural origin theories,
most of which call for a closed or flat universe. Something similar
occurs for the planets. We find sufficient created variety and uniqueness
in the solar system to cancel all natural attempts at an explanation,
including the popular nebular hypothesis.
What then is dark matter? I have suggested that dark matter exists
within galaxies, if not elsewhere. We have considered various physical
micro and macro-size possibilities. But there is another option. Perhaps
the dark matter we seek is in reality the unseen hand of the Creator.
We know from Colossians 1: 17 that God in some way holds all things
together. Therefore at some point, physical reality must mesh with the
spiritual. And that point may lie in the unexplicable problems of modern
The law of gravity has been known since it was first explained by Isaac
Newton in 1687. On a deep level, however, gravity remains a mystery
.That is, we have no idea how objects physically communicate their positions
and interact with each other. This ignorance about gravity or dark matter,
for both creationists and non-creationists alike, should be a humbling
experience. We know very little about physical reality, since we presently
"see through a glass darkly" (I Corinthians 13: 12). Creationists
look forward to the future, when our understanding will be made complete.
Arny, T. 1998 Explorations -An introduction to astronomy. McGraw
Hill, New York.
Burbidge, G., F. Hoyle and J.V. Narlikar. 1999. A different approach
to cosmology. Physics Today 52(4):38-44.
Bowers, R.L. and T. Deemings. 1984. Astrophysics II. Jones and
Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
Bruck, M. T .1990. Exercises in practical astronomy using photographs.
Adam Hilger, New York.
DeYoung, D. 1986. Is there an 'Empty Place' in the North? Creation
Research Society Quarterly 23(3): 129-131.
Hawking, Stephen. 1996. The illustrated brief history of time.
Bantam Books, New York.
Hawley, J.F. and K.A. Holcomb. 1998. Foundations of modem cosmology.
Oxford University Press, New York.
Holz, D.E. 1999. Shedding light on dark matter. Nature 400( 6747):819-820.
Sagan, C. 1994. Pale blue dot. Random House, New York.
Seife, C. 1999. Deep in the coal mine something stirred. New Scientist
Steidl, P. 1983. Solar neutrinos and a young sun. In Mulfinger, G., Editor.
Design and origins in astronomy. Creation Research Society Books,
St. Joseph, MO. pp. 113-125.
Trimble, V. 1987. Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe.
Annual Review of Astronomy physics 25:425-72.
© Copyright 2001-2013, Creation
Research Society. All rights reserved.
Copyright & Permissions